As the 2024 presidential election approaches, European clean energy companies are reevaluating their expansion plans into the U.S. market. The possibility of Donald Trump winning the presidency has cast doubt on the future of President Joe Biden's climate policies and the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), a key driver of recent investments in sustainable energy.
The Impact of Political Uncertainty
Trump has been vocal about his opposition to Biden's climate policies, dismissing them as a "green new scam." His potential return to office has raised concerns among European firms about the stability of incentives provided under the IRA. The act, passed in 2022, offers tax breaks and subsidies to U.S. and foreign companies investing in clean energy, but Trump's previous stance on climate change suggests he may attempt to dismantle these policies.
Peter Roessner, CEO of Luxembourg-based hydrogen firm H2Apex, highlighted the risks: "With a Donald Trump who is very opportunistic, polemic, and unpredictable, you have to ask yourself whether it makes sense to make such a bet." Roessner’s company had plans to build a hydrogen tank production plant in the U.S., significantly subsidized by the IRA. However, those plans were shelved in February due to the uncertainty surrounding Trump’s potential re-election.
Market Reactions and Corporate Strategies
The market's response to Trump’s rising political prospects has been mixed. The performance of clean tech shares, represented by the RENIXX index, has underperformed compared to global stocks since Trump’s increased likelihood of winning the Republican nomination.
SMA Solar, a German solar firm, issued a profit warning last month, citing the potential change in the U.S. government as a significant risk factor. While SMA has not completely abandoned its U.S. expansion plans, it acknowledged that the uncertain election outcome is causing hesitation among investors in renewable energy.
Sector-Wide Hesitation and Delays
The apprehension extends across the clean energy sector. Orsted, the world’s largest offshore wind farm developer, has faced significant setbacks after Trump threatened to target the sector on his first day in office if re-elected. Although Orsted declined to comment, the impact on their operations is evident.
On the other hand, some companies remain committed to their U.S. expansion. Nordex, a German wind turbine maker, announced last month that it would resume production at a previously mothballed plant in Iowa, expressing confidence in the U.S. market’s potential regardless of political developments.
Broader Economic Impact
The uncertainty surrounding the U.S. election is not only affecting clean tech firms. Thyssenkrupp Nucera, a hydrogen firm, has reported delays in final investment decisions for U.S. projects, directly affecting their financial outlook. Similarly, Nel, a Norwegian hydrogen company, has yet to finalize investment decisions for a planned production facility in Michigan.
Even beyond the clean energy sector, the political uncertainty is causing widespread economic repercussions. German machinery firm Trumpf reported a 12% drop in U.S. sales for the 2023/24 fiscal year, attributing the decline to "geopolitical uncertainties" impacting industrial customer confidence.
Navigating Political and Economic Uncertainty
The growing complexity of global political and economic landscapes is creating significant challenges for companies. Marcus Berret, global managing director at Roland Berger, described the situation as "analysis paralysis" in boardrooms, where the increased uncertainty complicates investment decisions.
As the U.S. presidential election looms, European clean energy firms and other international companies must carefully navigate these uncertainties, balancing potential risks with strategic opportunities in the evolving political landscape.
Source: Reuters
Commenti