Plastic Recycling Neglect: Major Environmental Setbacks Highlighted by The Telegraph

Despite the significant environmental benefits, plastic recycling remains widely neglected by both individuals and major corporations, such as supermarkets, according to a recent analysis by The Telegraph. Shockingly, most of the plastic waste collected ends up being incinerated rather than recycled. The investigation underscores how the initiatives from petrochemical companies, manufacturers, and retailers aimed at mitigating plastic waste have been largely ineffective and, in some cases, may even cause more environmental harm than good when improperly executed.

Tesco’s failed plastic recycling initiative highlights the global problem of waste mismanagement, where much of the collected plastic is incinerated, worsening environmental damage. Photo: Unsplash

One case in point is Tesco’s 2021 initiative in the UK, where the supermarket chain introduced special bins for soft plastic waste, promising to collect over 1,000 tons of plastic annually. However, a subsequent investigation revealed that a large portion of this plastic was incinerated, rather than recycled, a widespread issue that extends beyond soft plastics.

In fact, in the UK, 58% of all plastic waste is incinerated, while 14% is exported, and 11% is sent to landfills. Only a mere 17% is truly recycled, as highlighted by the report. The issue is exacerbated by a lack of clear regulations governing recycling symbols on product packaging, leaving consumers confused about what can and cannot be recycled.

Related: Which European Countries Consume the Most Bottled Water?

The United States is also grappling with this challenge. California recently sued ExxonMobil for misleading the public about the reliability of its chemical recycling process, which targets heat-resistant plastics. Promises about the efficiency of this recycling method were overly optimistic, creating confusion for consumers regarding which plastics are recyclable.

One of the major reasons for the recycling failure, according to experts, is the low cost of producing new plastic, making the recycling of such cheap materials financially unviable. As a result, many companies prefer to export or incinerate the waste. Moreover, pressure from customers to reduce plastic use has led supermarkets to switch to alternatives like paper and cardboard, which often have a higher carbon footprint.

The report also emphasizes that plastics make up only about 0.5% of global material usage, with other industries, such as steel and cement, leaving a far larger carbon footprint. Despite this, finding an economically viable solution to plastic recycling remains a critical environmental issue.

Source: The Telegraph